Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

This study investigates the impact of community engagement on border surveillance in Yunusari Local Government Area, Nigeria. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the research explores how active community participation can enhance the effectiveness of border surveillance efforts. Data were collected through surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions with community members, border guards, and local government officials. Key findings indicate that increased community engagement improves information flow, enhances early warning systems, and strengthens trust between local communities and border security agencies. The study also highlights challenges such as resistance to change, lack of resources, and inadequate training. Recommendations are provided to foster greater collaboration and mutual benefit between communities and border surveillance authorities, emphasizing the importance of empowering residents as key stakeholders in national security. This research contributes to the broader understanding of how community-driven initiatives can support more effective border management strategies in Nigeria.

Community Engagement, Border Surveillance, Community Participation, Yunusari Local Government Area.

1. Adamu, Y. A. (2024). Community-based border policing: A strategy for improving security along Nigeria’s borders. African Security Review, 32(1), 45-63. https://journals.sagepub.com
2. Adebayo, A. A. (2021). Community participation and security governance in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. African Security Review, 30(2), 145-162.
3. Andreas, P. (2012). Border games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico divide. Cornell University Press.
4. Andreas, P. (2012). Border games: Policing the US-Mexico divide. Cornell University Press.
5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
6. Carrera, S., den Hertog, L., & Parkin, J. (2017). The peculiar nature of EU border management: Policy gaps and border communities. Journal of European Integration, 39(3), 295-310.
7. Chatterjee, S. (2020). India’s border security challenges: The role of local communities in countering transnational threats. South Asian Survey, 27(1), 56-72.
8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
9. Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: Participation on whose terms?. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 441-454.
10. Nantulya, P. (2021). Uganda’s community policing and cross-border security cooperation: Lessons for Africa. African Defense Review, 15(2), 98-115.
11. OECD. (2016). OECD guidelines on citizen engagement for public decision making. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
12. Okoli, A. C., & Orinya, S. (2022). Border security and transnational threats in Nigeria: Rethinking community-based approaches. African Security, 15(1), 47-65.
13. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
14. Ruteere, M., & Mutahi, P. (2019). Nyumba Kumi and border security in Kenya: Assessing the effectiveness of community-based surveillance programs. Journal of East African Studies, 13(4), 567-583.
15. Sani, M., & Mohammed, Y. (2020). Community Participation in Border Security: Case Studies from Northeastern Nigeria. Journal of Community Development, 15(3), 220-235.
16. Weber, L., & Bowling, B. (2008). Valiant beggars and global vagabonds: Select, eject, immobilize. Theoretical Criminology, 12(3), 355-375.
17. Zaiotti, R. (2016). Externalizing migration management: Europe, North America and the spread of 'remote control' practices. Routledge.