Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

The Elsan Evaluation of Environmental Impact (EEEI) method represents a transformative approach to assessing environmental impacts in rural communities affected by industrial activities, particularly mining. This study focuses on three communities in Tankoro Chiefdom, Sierra Leone—Kanniya, Koakoyima, and Sahr Quee Town—to evaluate the environmental, social, and economic consequences of mining operations. The EEEI method integrates community perceptions with advanced statistical analyses, offering a unique combination of inclusivity and rigour.

Using multivariate statistical techniques, the study identifies significant environmental degradation, including deforestation and water contamination, as well as socio-economic disruptions, such as displacement and loss of traditional livelihoods. Positive impacts, such as job creation and infrastructure development, were observed but were limited in scope and overshadowed by the broader negative consequences. Unlike traditional approaches like the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM), which rely on qualitative scoring, the EEEI method employs a standardised numerical framework, allowing for objective, replicable, and scalable evaluations.

Results demonstrate significant main effects for individual predictors and highlight a moderate interaction effect between the Kanniya and Sahr Quee Town communities. The study concludes that the EEEI method is a robust tool for environmental assessments, capable of revealing critical insights into the interconnected dynamics of industrial impacts. Recommendations are provided for further testing and refinement of the EEEI model across diverse contexts, emphasising its potential for broader application in environmental governance and policymaking.

Multivariate, EEEI, Communities, Environmental impacts.

1. Ali, S. H., Sturman, K., & Collins, N. (2017). Mining, the Environment, and Indigenous Development Conflicts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.148
2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
4. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2013). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (4th ed.). Routledge.
5. Hilson G. & Maconachie R. (2009)  Good governance and the extractive industries in Sub-Saharan Africa January 2009Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review 30(1):52-100DOI:10.1080/08827500802045511
6. Hilson, G. (2002) Small-Scale Mining in Africa: Tackling Pressing Environmental Problems with Improved Strategy. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11, 149-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10796502011002003
7. Kitula, A.G.N. (2006) The Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Mining on Local Livelihoods in Tanzania: A Case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 405e414.
8. Noble B.F. (2004) Strategic environmental assessment quality assurance: evaluating and improv ing the consistency of judgments in assessment panels. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2004; 24:3–25.
9. Oprea C. 2014, Multivariate Analysis of Environmental Data By SPSS. publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237375865
10. Pastakia, C. M. R. and Jensen, A. (1998): The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) for Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(5), pp. 461-482
11. Reed, M. S. (2008) Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
12. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.