Towards a Digital Humanism: A Critical Analysis of Ethical Dimensions in UNESCO’s AI Frameworks (2021–2025)

Author's Information:

Dr Raphaël Hubert Elie Sebire

Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Colima, Mexico

Vol 02 No 11 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 11 November 2025

Page No.: 644-647

Abstract:

This article presents a critical analysis of UNESCO’s normative frameworks on artificial intelligence (AI) and education produced between 2021 and 2025. Drawing upon four key documents — the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021), the Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research (2024) and the AI Competency Frameworks for Teachers and for Learners (2025) — the study examines how UNESCO’s human-centred approach redefines the ethical and pedagogical foundations of education in the digital age. Using qualitative documentary analysis, it explores the evolution of UNESCO’s discourse from a declarative and normative ethics to a pedagogical and operational one. The findings reveal that the recent frameworks translate universal human values — such as dignity, inclusion, justice, and sustainability — into observable educational competences that transform both teaching and learning practices. Teachers are redefined as ethical mediators and learners as reflective citizens, capable of co-creating responsible intelligences. The discussion introduces the concept of an ecopedagogy of intelligence, linking ethics and sustainability within digital education. By aligning ethical AI with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4, 10, 13 and 16), UNESCO proposes a model of digital humanism grounded in human dignity, ecological awareness, and collective responsibility.

KeyWords:

UNESCO; artificial intelligence; digital humanism; educational ethics; sustainability; ecopedagogy; educational governance.

References:

  1. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  2. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  3. Gadotti, M. (2000). Pedagogia da Terra. São Paulo: Instituto Paulo Freire.
  4. Knox, J. (2023). Postdigital Ethics: Reclaiming Human–Technology Relations. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  5. Luckin, R. (2018). Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
  6. Sauvé, L. (2014). Pour une éducation relative à l’environnement. Montréal: UQAM.
  7. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  8. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.
  9. UNESCO. (2024). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO.
  10. UNESCO. (2025a). AI Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO.
  11. UNESCO. (2025b). AI Competency Framework for Learners. Paris: UNESCO.
  12. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0