Determinants of Mobile Banking Adoption Among Undergraduates in Sri Lanka: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Author's Information:

Prof. Gamini Weerasinghe

Department of Economics, University of Sri Jayewardenepura

Vol 02 No 11 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 11 November 2025

Page No.: 697-704

Abstract:

This study examines the factors influencing the demand for mobile banking among undergraduates in Sri Lanka, applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its extended constructs perceived ease of use, perceived credibility, perceived risk, and perceived trust. Despite the rapid digital transformation in the banking sector, the adoption of mobile banking among young consumers in developing economies remains inconsistent. Using quantitative research design, data was collected from 160 undergraduates across selected state universities through a structured questionnaire. Statistical analyses, including correlation and multiple regression, were performed using SPSS software to identify the determinants of mobile banking adoption. The results revealed that perceived ease of use, perceived credibility, and perceived risk significantly influenced undergraduates’ intention to use mobile banking, while perceived trust was statistically insignificant. Among these factors, perceived ease of use emerged as the strongest predictor, indicating that user-friendly interfaces and system simplicity are critical in promoting mobile banking usage. The findings suggest that young consumers’ adoption decisions are driven more by functionality and perceived security than by interpersonal trust. The study contributes to the existing literature by validating the extended TAM in the Sri Lankan context and highlighting the importance of usability and credibility in digital financial services. It further provides practical insights for policymakers and financial institutions to enhance mobile banking adoption and promote digital financial inclusion among youth.

KeyWords:

Mobile banking, Technology Acceptance Model, perceived ease of use, perceived credibility, perceived risk, perceived trust.

References:

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Bagozzi, R., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. 
  3. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  4. Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B. W., & Khedmatgozar, H. (2014). A systematic review of Internet banking adoption. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 492-510. 
  5. Jeong, S. H., & Yoon, S. (2013). The role of trust in consumer acceptance of mobile financial services: The influence of credibility. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 11(1), 82-106.
  6. Kesharwani, A., & Bisht, S. S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on Internet banking adoption in India: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303-322.
  7. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta‐analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755.
  8. Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873-891. 
  9. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
  10. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359.
  11. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment‐trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
  12. Riquelme, H. E., & Rios, R. E. (2010). The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 328-341.
  13. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson.
  14. Singh, S. (2010). Investigating the impact of mobile banking on the banking sector (Master’s thesis). 
  15. Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H. H. & Tang, T. I. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 500-519. 
  16. Zhou, T. (2009). The effect of initial trust on consumer online behaviour. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 24-30.