Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

After the enactment of UU Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 concerning Regional Government, the era of regional autonomy also applies throughout Indonesia. The impact is that there is a "division" and "transfer" of power from the central government to the regions. The implication is that organizational design must be discussed based on contemporary Job Design thinking. The goal is that we can produce a more communicative organizational structure in the realm of regional autonomy in two types or forms of organization. First, mechanistic organizational design - which is characterized by, among others, very high horizontal differentiation, cold and rigid hierarchical relationships, the obligation to carry out fixed tasks, high formalization accompanied by the use of very formal communication channels, and centralized decision-making authority. Second, the characteristics of an organic organization, namely an organization that has very low horizontal differentiation (read: for example, the difference in job content between several work units is very small). If this happens, then theoretically we can reduce the number of bureaus or sections, the method is by collaborating, namely vertical and horizontal mergers'

regional autonomy, organizational restructuring, regional regulations, organizational effectiveness and efficiency.

1. Aswathappa, K. (2008). Organizational Behaviour. Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi
2. Azfar, O., Kahkonen, S., Lanyi,  A. & Rutherford, D.  (1999) Decentralization, Governance  and  Public Services  the Impact  of Intitutional  Arrangements:  A Review  of  the Literature, IRIS Center (University of Maryland), pp. 1-35.
3. Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK: Edward Elger Publishing.
4. Begg, I., Lansbury, M., and Mayes, D. (1995). The case for decentralised industry policy. In Cheshire, P. and Gordon, I., editors, Territorial Competition in an Integrating Europe. Aldershot, Avebury
5. Bennett, R. (1990). Decentralisation and local economic development. In Bennett, R., editor, Decentralisation, Governments and Markets. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
6. Börzel, Tanja A./Pamuk, Yasemin/Stahn, Andreas (2009): Democracy or Stability? EU and US Engagement in the Southern Caucasus, in: Magen, Amichai/McFaul, Michael/Risse, Thomas (Hrsg.): Democracy Promotion in the EU and the EU Compared, Houndmills.
7. Bovaird, T. & Loffler, E. (Eds.) (2003) Public Management and Governance (New York: Routledge)
8. Brendan Martin (1997) Reform Of Public Sector Management A relevant question for Unions in the Public Sector? . See chapter 1 : Old Wine in New Bottles.
9. Brettell, C. B., & Reed-Danahay, D. (2011). Civic engagements: The citizenship practices of Indian and Vietnamese immigrants. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press
10. Darwall, Stephen, 1995. Hume and the Invention of Utilitarianism, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
11. Driver, Julia, (2004). “Pleasure as the Standard of Virtue in Hume's Moral Philosophy.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly., 85: 173–194.
12. Freixas, J., & Zwicker, W. S. (2003). Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval. Social Choice and Welfare, 21(3), 399–431.
13. Hoffmann, W., & Ariyoruk, A. (2005). Security Council reform models: Models A and B, Italian proposal, blue and green models and a new model C. New York: Center for UN Reform Education.
14. Johnson, C. (2001) Local Democracy, Democratic Decentralisation and Rural Development: Theories, Challenges and Options for Policy, Development Policy Review, 19 (4), pp. 521-532
15. Kellermann, K. and Schmidt, H. (1997). Regional growth and convergence in a tax-sharing system. In Danson, M., editor, Regional Governance and Economic Development. Pion, London.
16. Magen, Amichai/Morlino, Leonardo (Hrsg.) 2008: Anchoring Democracy. External Influence on Domestic Rule of Law Development, London.
17. Prasojo, E., Maksum, I. R. & Kurniawan, T. (2006) Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah: Antara Model  Demokrasi Lokal dan  Efisiensi Struktural (Depok: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI)
18. Robbins, S., Timothy.A.J.,Sanghi, S. (2009). Organizational Behaviour: Text and Cases. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
19. Rondinelli,  D. A.,  Nellis, J.  R. & Cheema,  G. S.  (1983) Decentralization  in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience (Washington DC: The World Bank)
20. Stigler, G. (1975) The Citizen and the State: Essays on Regulation, Chicago: University  of Chicago Press.
21. Straffin, P. D. (1983). Power indices in politics. In S. J. Brams, W. F. Lucas, & P. D. Straffin (Eds.), Political and related models (pp. 256–321). New York: Springer.
22. Thoha, M. (2004) Birokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada)
23. Thomas Bridges (1997) The Culture of Citizenship: Inventing Postmodern Civic Culture. Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change. Series I, Culture and Values, Volume 26, (Second Edition). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy - Washington, D.C.
24. Toonen, T.A.J (1997). Public sector reform in Western Europe: A paradigm shift  or public  administration  as usual. In  J.J.  Hesse & T.A.J.  Toonen (Eds.),  The yearbook  of  comparative government  and  public administration (Vol. III) (pp. 485-95). Baden-Baden: Nomos.