Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

This study explored the key areas of ELT in which transformations happened by AI integration, with a specific focus on the pedagogical designs, teaching methods, and teacher and learner roles. Having assessed 35 peer-reviewed articles published during 2023 through 2025 employing qualitative metasynthesis methodology and guided by grounded theory the study has identified the most significant parameters that facilitate the transformation of ELT pedagogy. The parameters that rendered the transformations in ELT possible were critically evaluated and analyzed using open coding, axial coding, and category synthesis as outlined in grounded theory and used in grounding a core theory. The key areas in which pedagogical shifts happened were identified to be instructional design transformation, learner-centered pedagogy, teacher role reconfiguration, skill-specific enhancement, and institutional and cultural mediation. The findings suggest that although AI applications like ChatGPT, automated writing evaluation, and adaptive learning technologies help in improving personalized treatment, interaction, and teaching, they also generate ethical, digital equity, and humanistic issues. The study emphasized the significance of continued teacher training, the requirement for culturally sensitiveand flexible policies to promote the successful integration of AI. These observations contribute to providing valuable directions to institutions that intend to become leaders in AI-driven ELT.

AI-integrated ELT, qualitative metasynthesis, grounded theory, PRISMA guidelines, pedagogical transformation.

1. S. A. Alkhalifah, A. A. Bedaiwi, M. A. Shaikh, M. Seddiq, and S. A. Meo, “Existential anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI)—Is it the end of the human era or a new chapter in the human revolution? Questionnaire-based observational study,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 15, Art. no. 1368122, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1368122.
2. K. M. Alshewiter, F. S. S. Mohammad, A. T. Shawaqfeh, A. J. Khasawneh, H. Alqudah, Y. J. A. Khasawneh, and M. A. S. Khasawneh, “Improving the learning of language proficiency at the tertiary education level through AI-driven assessment models and automated feedback systems,” Migration Letters, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 712–726, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/6216/4203
3. D. Altamimi, “AI integrating in EFL classrooms: A study on lecturers' adaptation and student outcomes,” Arab World English Journal, pp. 364–379, 2025, doi: 10.24093/awej/call11.22.
4. K. Benek, “EFL learners' and teachers' perceptions of AI-powered language learning technologies: Benefits and challenges,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–120, 2025, doi: 10.29333/iji.2025.1827a.
5. S. Bibi and A. K. Shahzad, “Impact of artificial intelligence on English language teaching at university level: A study of EFL teachers' perspectives in Pakistan,” Advance Social Science Archive Journal (ASSAJ), vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 200–234, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://assajournal.com/index.php/36/article/view/520/766
6. J. Chrastina, “Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies: Background, methodology and applications,” NORDSCI, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603222.pdf
7. M. F. Dogar and S. Khan, “AI-enhanced English language learning at the undergraduate level: A mixed-methods analysis of effectiveness and challenges,” Advance Social Science Archive Journal (ASSAJ), vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 503–513, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17360268.
8. N. G. Durón and A. L. Jiménez-Preciado, “Exploring the role of AI in higher education: A natural language processing analysis of emerging trends and discourses,” The TQM Journal, 2025, doi: 10.1108/TQM-10-2024-0376.
9. S. Esen, “Digital tools in second language learning in higher education: A systematic review of recent research,” Janus, vol. 16, no. 1, TD1, 2025, doi: 10.26619/1647-7251.DT0325.4.
10. P. Ester, P. Á. Caballero-García, I. Morales, and E. Cañadas, “Evaluating the use of AI in the design of learning situations by university students of early childhood education,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, Art. no. 1604414, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1604414.
11. G. Ferreiro-Santamaria, “Exploring the role of ChatGPT in English teaching within higher education settings,” International Journal of Trends and Developments in Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–58, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11204781.
12. J. Graff, “Moral sensitivity and the limits of artificial moral agents,” Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 26, Art. no. 13, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10676-024-09755-9.
13. D. N. L. Ha and A. T. Nguyen, “Artificial intelligence-based assessment in ELT exam creation: A case study of Van Lang University lecturers,” Saudi Journal of Language Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–49, 2025, doi: 10.1108/SJLS-06-2024-0030.
14. M. He, B. N. Abbasi, and J. He, “AI-driven language learning in higher education: An empirical study on self-reflection, creativity, anxiety, and emotional resilience in EFL learners,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05817-5.
15. N. Ivanytska, K. Olena, T. Kovalevska, O. Matsera, and T. Tkachuk, “Analyzing the possibilities of implementation of AI and social networks in teaching foreign language students: Ukrainian universities case study,” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4814759
16. R. Kalra, “Exploring teachers' perceptions toward the integration of AI tools in the language classroom,” NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, vol. 29, no. 45, pp. 21–36, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NJLC/article/view/280606
17. B. Karki and T. M. Karki, “Integrating AI in English language teaching: Challenges and opportunities,” Dristikon: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2025, doi: 10.3126/dristikon.v15i1.77118.
18. L. Kilė, “The integration of generative AI in foreign language teacher education: A systematic literature review,” Pedagogika, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 5–26, 2024, doi: 10.15823/p.2024.154.1.
19. D. Kilov, C. Hendy, S. Y. Guyot, A. J. Snoswell, and S. Lazar, “Discerning what matters: A multi‐dimensional assessment of moral competence in LLMs,” arXiv, 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.13082.
20. B. Klimova, M. Pikhart, P. Polakova, M. Cerna, S. Y. Yayilgan, and S. Shaikh, “A systematic review of the use of emerging technologies in teaching English as an applied language at the university level,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 42, 2023, doi: 10.3390/systems11010042.
21. N. A. Koka, “An insight into the efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI)-Chatbot as digital tutors for enhancing learners' motivation and performance in linguistics courses,” Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001449.
22. O. Köksal and B. N. Z. Kale, “Integration of technology in the teaching of English as a foreign language: A review study,” Turkish Studies – Language and Literature, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2231–2240, 2025, doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.82557.
23. J. Lachal, A. Revah-Levy, M. Orri, and M. R. Moro, “Metasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 8, Art. no. 269, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269.
24. A. Laitinen and O. Sahlgren, “AI systems and respect for human autonomy,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, Art. no. 705164, 2021, doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.705164.
25. P. R. Lewis and Ş. Sarkadi, “Reflective artificial intelligence,” Minds & Machines, vol. 34, Art. no. 14, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11023-024-09664-2.
26. J. Liu, A. J. B. Sihes, and Y. Lu, “How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners' critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 48, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0.
27. C. M. Méndez-Alarcón, O. Adebola Lasekan, and V. Pachava, “Assessing the impact of AI integration course on students' AI competencies and readiness in preservice EFL teacher education,” Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001137.
28. M. A. Mohammed, R. J. Moles, and T. F. Chen, “Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: The challenges and opportunities,” Int. J. Clin. Pharm., vol. 38, pp. 695–704, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0289-2.
29. H. Noble and G. Mitchell, “What is grounded theory?,” Evidence-Based Nursing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 34–35, 2016, doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102306.
30. S. S. Nykyporets, O. D. Melnyk, S. Y. Piddubchak, M. B. Melnyk, and O. O. Krutchenko, “The efficacy of AI-driven pedagogical strategies for foreign language acquisition in higher education,” Society and National Interests, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 24–36, 2025, doi: 10.52058/3041-1572-2025-2(10)-24-36.
31. A. W. Ou, C. Stöhr, and H. Malmström, “Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective,” System, vol. 121, Art. no. 103225, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103225.
32. M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, 2021.
33. M. Passamonti, “Why machines can't be moral: Turing's halting problem and the moral limits of artificial intelligence,” arXiv, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16890.
34. M. Pikhart, B. Klimova, and L. H. Al-Obaydi, “Exploring university students' preferences and satisfaction in utilizing digital tools for foreign language learning,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, Art. no. 1412377, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1412377.
35. M. Queloz, “On the fundamental limitations of AI moral advisors,” Philosophy & Technology, vol. 38, Art. no. 71, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s13347-025-00896-3.
36. N. Sarnovska, J. Rybinska, and Y. Mykhailichenko, “Enhancing university remote language learning through innovative applications of artificial intelligence technologies amidst global challenges,” Teaching Languages at Higher Educational Establishments at the Present Stage. Intersubject Relations, no. 44, pp. 151–165, 2024, doi: 10.26565/2073-4379-2024-44-10.
37. K. M. Sheldon, “Recognizing and enhancing sapient agency within AIs: A free will perspective,” Discover Psychology, vol. 5, Art. no. 79, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44202-025-00425-5.
38. N. Schuster and D. Kilov, “Moral disagreement and the limits of AI value alignment: A dual challenge of epistemic justification and political legitimacy,” AI & Society, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02427-2.
39. H. L. Shruthi, A. Radhakrishnan, A. D. Veigas, D. J. Railis, and R. S. Dinesh, “Analyzing pedagogy and education in English language teaching using information and communication technology,” Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–23, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13439-2.
40. J. Southworth et al., “Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, Art. no. 100127, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127.
41. R. Thornberg, L. Perhamus, and K. Charmaz, “Grounded theory,” in Handbook of Research Methods in Early Childhood Education: Research Methodologies, vol. 1, 2014, pp. 405–439. [Online]. Available: http://61.2.46.60:8088/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1393/1/Handbook%20of%20Research%20Methods%20in%20Early%20Childhood%20Education%20Research%20Methodologies,%20Volume.pdf#page=416
42. Y. C. Tseng and Y. H. Lin, “Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' writing with ChatGPT: A university-level course design,” Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 78–97, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329.
43. J. Wang, “Self-awareness, a singularity of AI,” Philosophy Study, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 68–77, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/6454a6a738fa1.pdf
44. B. Waluyo and S. Kusumastuti, “Generative AI in student English learning in Thai higher education: More engagement, better outcomes?,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 10, Art. no. 101146, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101146.
45. J. F. Wolfswinkel, E. Furtmueller, and C. P. Wilderom, “Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2017, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2011.51.
46. M. G. Yaseen and S. S. Alnakeeb, “Exploring the evolution of AI integration in English as a foreign language education: A Scopus-based bibliometric analysis (1997–2023),” Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, pp. 143–158, 2023, doi: 10.58496/MJCSC/2023/019.
47. M. Younas, U. Noor, D. A. S. El-Dakhs, and B. Anwar, “Evaluating the effectiveness of digital scenario-based English teaching at the university level using the artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC),” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, Art. no. 1670892, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1670892.
48. M. Zaim et al., “AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, Art. no. 100335, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335.
49. S. Zaimoğlu and A. Dağtaş, “Teacher cognition and practices in using generative AI tools to support student engagement in EFL higher-education contexts,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, Art. no. 1202, 2025, doi: 10.3390/bs15091202.
50. Q. Zhou, H. Hashim, and N. A. Sulaiman, “Supporting English-speaking practice in higher education: The impact of AI chatbot-integrated mobile-assisted blended learning framework,” Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–32, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13401-2.