Positional Prominence and Information Structure in Cameroon English: Nativised Grammatical Correlates in a New English

Author's Information:

Dr. Charles Abimnui Azane

Department of English, University of Buea, Cameroon 

Vol 03 No 04 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 04 April 2026

Page No.: 369-377

Abstract:

This paper examines the grammatical structures through which positional prominence is realised in Cameroon English (CamE), situated within the theoretical framework of New Englishes scholarship. Positional prominence refers to the use of sentence-initial syntactic position to signal what is topical, focal, or discourse-salient in an utterance. Four grammatical structures are identified as the primary realisations of this phenomenon in CamE: topicalization, left-dislocation with resumptive pronouns, cleft constructions, and focus fronting. Data drawn from a corpus of naturalistic spoken and written CamE (approximately 125,000 words) are used to demonstrate that these are not instances of non-standard usage but rule-governed, nativised features of an emergent endonormative grammar. The analysis draws on Lambrecht's (1994) information structure framework, Schneider's (2007) Dynamic Model of postcolonial Englishes, and Mufwene's (2001) feature pool model. Substrate influence from Cameroonian indigenous languages, many of which are topic-prominent in the typological sense of Li and Thompson (1976), is identified as a conditioning factor in the development of these features. The paper contributes to the descriptive literature on African Englishes and advocates for the systematic inclusion of information-structural features in the grammatical documentation of CamE.

KeyWords:

Cameroon English, information structure, nativization, New Englishes, positional prominence

References:

  1. Anchimbe, Eric A. 2006. CameroonEnglish: Authenticity, Ecologyand Evolution. Peter Lang.
  2. Ayafor, Miriam. 2004. "Cameroon Pidgin English (Kamtok): Morphology and Syntax." In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, edited by Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider, and Clive Upton, 909–928. Mouton de Gruyter.
  3. Bamgbose, Ayo. 1992. "Standard Nigerian English: Issues of Identification." In The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, 2nd ed., edited by BrajB. Kachru, 148–161. University of Illinois Press.
  4. Bamgbose, Ayo. 2001."World Englishes and Globalization." World Englishes 20 (3): 357–363.
  5. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
  6. Biloa, Edmond. 1995. Functional Categories and the Syntax of Focus in Tuki. LINCOM Europa.
  7. Chafe, Wallace. 1976. "Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View." In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles N. Li, 25–55. Academic Press.
  8. Collins, Peter. 1991.Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English.Routledge.
  9. Ethnologue. 2023. Languages of Cameroon, 26th ed. SIL International. https://www.ethnologue.com
  10. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967."Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2." Journalof Linguistics 3 (2): 199–244.
  11. Hyman, Larry M. 1990. "Topic, Focus, and theBantu Verbal System." In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on General Topics in African Linguistics, edited by R. Turvey and C. Culy, 159–174. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
  12. Hyman, Larry M., and John R. Watters. 1984. "Auxiliary Focus." Studies in African Linguistics 15 (3): 233–273.
  13. Kachru, Braj B., ed. 1982. The Other Tongue:English Across Cultures. University of IllinoisPress. Kachru, Braj B. 1991. "Liberation Linguistics and the Quirk Concern." English Today 7 (1): 3–13.
  14. Kachru, Braj B. 1992. "The Second Diaspora of English." In English in Its Social Contexts: Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics, edited by Tim W. Machan and Charles T. Scott, 230–252. Oxford University Press.
  15. Kouega, Jean-Paul. 2007. A Dictionary of Cameroon EnglishUsage. Peter Lang.
  16. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. "Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language." In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles N. Li, 457–489. Academic Press.
  18. Mbangwana, Paul N. 2004. "Cameroon English:Morphology and Syntax." In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, edited by Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider, and Clive Upton, 898–908. Mouton de Gruyter.
  19. Mbangwana, Paul N., and Bonaventure M. Sala. 2009.Cameroon English Morphology and Syntax: Major Trends in Action. Peter Lang.
  20. Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New LinguisticVarieties. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge University Press. Nkemleke, Daniel A. 2006. "Some Characteristics of Expository Writing in Cameroon English." English World-Wide 27 (1): 25–44.
  22. Platt, John, Heidi Weber,and Mian Lian Ho. 1984. The New Englishes. Routledge.
  23. Prince, Ellen F. 1981. "Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information." In Radical Pragmatics, edited by Peter Cole, 223–255. Academic Press.
  24. Quirk, Randolph.1990. "Language Varieties and Standard Language." English Today 6 (1): 3–10.
  25. Sala, Bonaventure M. 2006. "DoesCameroonian English Have Grammatical Norms?" English Today 22 (4): 59–64.
  26. Schmied, Josef. 1991. Englishin Africa: An Introduction. Longman.
  27. Schneider, EdgarW. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Aroundthe World. CambridgeUniversity Press.
  28. Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The Emergence of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford University Press.