Improving the Quality of Oversight Activities of the People’s Council of Linh Toai Commune, Thanh Hoa Province: Evidence from A Newly Merged Commune

Author's Information:

Hoang Huy Tu

Graduate Student, Faculty of Public Management, Thanh Hoa University of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam

Vol 03 No 04 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 04 April 2026

Page No.: 434-441

Abstract:

This article examines how the quality of oversight exercised by the People’s Council of Linh Toai Commune can be improved in the context of administrative reorganization and rising expectations for grassroots accountability. The study adopts a single-case design and combines legal analysis, documentary analysis, and a descriptive survey. Documentary sources include legal instruments governing local oversight, socioeconomic reports of Thanh Hoa Province, the 2026 organizational report of the People’s Council of Linh Toai Commune, and records inherited from predecessor communes. The survey dataset consists of 120 valid responses, including 30 People’s Council delegates, 20 commune officials and civil servants, and 70 voters. Descriptive statistics on a five-point Likert scale were used to assess five dimensions of oversight quality: planning, evidence collection, questioning and explanation, transparency and citizen participation, and post-oversight follow-up. The findings show that Linh Toai Commune has maintained the operational continuity of its representative institution after merger and has selected oversight topics that are relatively close to voters’ daily concerns, especially waste-fee collection and benefits for meritorious service beneficiaries. However, the weakest links remain evidence triangulation, digital tools for receiving public feedback, and the institutionalization of follow-up after oversight conclusions are issued. Reform priorities identified by respondents focus on standardized procedures and forms, practical training for delegates, stronger post-oversight monitoring, data management, and broader citizen participation. The article argues that in newly merged communes, oversight quality depends less on the formal availability of powers than on procedural standardization, usable data, and the ability to convert conclusions into enforceable follow-up actions.

KeyWords:

People’s Council; local oversight; commune governance; administrative merger; Thanh Hoa; accountability.

References:

  1. Centre for Governance and Scrutiny. (2019). The Good Scrutiny Guide. London: Centre for Governance and Scrutiny.
  2. Centre for Governance and Scrutiny. (2022). Demonstrating the Impact of Overview and Scrutiny. London: Centre for Governance and Scrutiny.
  3. Dang Van Hong. (2021). Oversight activities of commune-level People’s Councils: Evidence from Vinh Long Province (Master’s thesis). Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, Hanoi.
  4. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2001). Democracy at the Local Level. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  5. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2008). Evaluating Parliament: A Self-Assessment Toolkit for Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  6. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2008). Tools for Parliamentary Oversight: A Practical Handbook. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  7. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2018). Parliamentary Oversight: A Self-Assessment Toolkit. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  8. Inter-Parliamentary Union, & United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Global Parliamentary Report 2017: Parliamentary Oversight – Parliament’s Power to Hold Government to Account. Geneva and New York: IPU and UNDP.
  9. Linh Toai Commune People’s Council. (2026). Report on the organization and operation of the People’s Council of Linh Toai Commune from its establishment to the end of 2026, and tasks for the coming period. Linh Toai.
  10. National Assembly. (2011). Law on Complaints (No. 02/2011/QH13). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  11. National Assembly. (2013). Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  12. National Assembly. (2013). Law on Citizen Reception (No. 42/2013/QH13). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  13. National Assembly. (2015). Law on Oversight Activities of the National Assembly and People’s Councils (No. 87/2015/QH13). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  14. National Assembly. (2016). Law on Access to Information (No. 104/2016/QH13). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  15. National Assembly. (2022). Law on Implementation of Democracy at the Grassroots Level (No. 10/2022/QH15). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  16. National Assembly. (2025). Law on Organization of Local Government (No. 72/2025/QH15). Hanoi: National Assembly of Vietnam.
  17. Nguyen Dang Dung. (2016). The supervisory function of local councils. VNU Journal of Science.
  18. OECD. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Open Government. Paris: OECD.
  19. OECD. (2025). Open Government for Stronger Democracies. Paris: OECD.
  20. Permanent Committee of the National Assembly. (2022). Resolution No. 594/NQ-UBTVQH15 dated 12 September 2022 guiding oversight activities of People’s Councils and People’s Council delegates. Hanoi.
  21. Permanent Committee of the National Assembly. (2025). Resolution No. 1686/NQ-UBTVQH15 dated 16 June 2025 on the rearrangement of commune-level administrative units of Thanh Hoa Province in 2025. Hanoi.
  22. Provincial Statistics Office of Thanh Hoa. (2025). Socioeconomic situation in Quarter II and the first six months of 2025. Thanh Hoa.
  23. Provincial Statistics Office of Thanh Hoa. (2025). Socioeconomic situation in 2024. Thanh Hoa.
  24. Research Centre for Management and Sustainable Development, Centre for Community Support and Development Studies, Real-Time Analytics, & United Nations Development Programme. (2025). The Viet Nam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI) 2024. Hanoi.
  25. United Nations Development Programme. (2015). A Users’ Guide to Measuring Local Governance. New York: UNDP.
  26. World Bank. (1996). Participation and Local Government. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  27. World Bank. (2008). Local Government Discretion and Accountability: A Diagnostic Framework for Local Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank.