The Myth of Colonial Discovery: Renaming, Indigenous Erasure, And the Manufacture of Imperial Legitimacy

Author's Information:

Prof Samuel Mwituria Maina, PhD

The University of Nairobi

Vol 03 No 07 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 07 July 2026

Page No.: 903-918

Abstract:

Western colonial expansion has often been represented through narratives of exploration, discovery, and civilization in which European actors portrayed themselves as heroic discoverers of lands and peoples. However, these narratives frequently obscured the prior existence, knowledge systems, and historical agency of indigenous populations, transforming colonial expansion into an epistemic project of naming, renaming, and symbolic domination (Said, 1978).

The Main Objective of this paper was to critically examine how Western colonial discovery and naming practices functioned as instruments of deception, indigenous erasure, and imperial legitimization through the appropriation and renaming of geo-political and cultural artifacts. By integrating historical, archival, discursive, comparative, ethnographic, and oral history methods, the study constructed a multi-layered analytical framework capable of interrogating colonialism as a complex system of epistemic domination and historical fabrication.

It critically examines colonial discovery narratives as ideological constructs that manufactured imperial legitimacy and justified territorial occupation and cultural appropriation. It argues that through the renaming of geographical features, peoples, and cultural landscapes, colonial powers systematically erased indigenous identities and subordinated local systems of knowledge, memory, and spirituality to European epistemic authority (Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, 1986).

The study further demonstrates how colonial historiography and education reinforced these distortions by glorifying imperial conquest while concealing violence, dispossession, and cultural destruction. These processes contributed to psychological colonization and cultural alienation, shaping how colonized societies understood their own histories and identities (Fanon, 1967; Rodney, 1972).

Grounded in postcolonial and decolonial theory, the paper concludes that colonial discovery narratives were not neutral historical accounts but strategic instruments of domination. It calls for the restoration of indigenous names, histories, and epistemologies as a necessary step toward decolonial historical reconstruction and cultural reclamation.

KeyWords:

Colonial discovery, Geo-political renaming, Indigenous erasure, Epistemic deception, colonial violence, Historical misrepresentation, educational indoctrination

References:

  1. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
  2. Césaire, A. (1972). Discourse on colonialism (J. Pinkham, Trans.). Monthly Review Press. (Original work published 1955)
  3. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
  4. Diop, C. A. (1974). The African origin of civilization: Myth or reality. Lawrence Hill.
  5. Ehret, C. (2001). A historical-comparative reconstruction of Nilo-Saharan. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
  6. Elkins, C. (2005). Britain’s gulag: The brutal end of empire in Kenya. Jonathan Cape.
  7. Elkins, C. (2005). Imperial reckoning: The untold story of Britain’s gulag in Kenya. Henry Holt and Company.
  8. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). Grove Press.
  9. Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). Grove Press. (Original work published 1952)
  10. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
  11. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  12. Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.
  13. Galeano, E. (1973). Open veins of Latin America: Five centuries of the pillage of a continent. Monthly Review Press.
  14. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.
  15. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
  16. Hochschild, A. (1998). King Leopold’s ghost: A story of greed, terror, and heroism in colonial Africa. Houghton Mifflin.
  17. Loomba, A. (2005). Colonialism/Postcolonialism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  18. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Mazrui, A. A. (1986). The Africans: A triple heritage. Little, Brown.
  20. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press.
  21. Mbiti, J. S. (1969). African religions and philosophy. Heinemann.
  22. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
  23. Mudimbe, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy, and the order of knowledge. Indiana University Press.
  24. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
  25. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.
  26. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  27. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.
  28. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
  29. Vansina, J. (1985). Oral tradition as history. University of Wisconsin Press.
  30. Vansina, J. (1985). Oral tradition as history. University of Wisconsin Press.
  31. Woodson, C. G. (1933). The miseducation of the Negro. Associated Publishers.