Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

Live streaming commerce has emerged as a dominant retail channel in Vietnam, significantly altering consumer purchasing dynamics through real-time social engagement and high-interactivity environments. Drawing upon the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework, Social Influence Theory, and the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) perspective, this study investigates the empirical mechanism through which crowd interactions in live streaming streams influence the impulse buying behavior of Generation Z consumers. A quantitative cross-sectional design was executed, sampling 297 validated Gen Z respondents across major shopping platforms including TikTok Shop, Shopee Live, and Facebook Live. Structural Equation Modeling via Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) was utilized to evaluate measurement scale validity and test structural path hypotheses. The empirical findings reveal that Viewer-to-Viewer Interaction (β = 0.203, p < 0.05), Streamer-to-Viewer Interaction (β = 0.437, p < 0.001), and Perceived Product Popularity (β = 0.223, p < 0.001) significantly and positively stimulate Herd Psychology among Gen Z live streaming audiences. Subsequently, Herd Psychology exerts a profound positive influence on Impulse Buying Behavior (β = 0.630, p < 0.001), explaining 39.5% of the variance in unplanned purchasing decisions. Mediation analysis confirms that Herd Psychology functions as a robust complementary mediator bridging environmental live interactions and spontaneous purchases. Strategic managerial implications for e-commerce merchants and digital broadcasting platforms are discussed, alongside structural limitations and future empirical trajectories.

Live Streaming Commerce, Crowd Interaction, Herd Psychology, Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), Impulse Buying Behavior, Gen Z, S-O-R Framework, PLS-SEM.

1. Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins.
2. Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). How do live streaming platforms create value for consumers? A study based on S-O-R theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 345-361.
3. Kang, J., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2019). The role of scarcity and social value in impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(3), 234-245.
4. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60.
5. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356.
6. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183-207.
7. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press.
8. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848.
9. Rook, D. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 205-313.
10. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886.
11. Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 543-556.