Social Science and Human Research Bulletin

The reconfiguration of the global geopolitical order is broadening the meaning of national power beyond military and economic capabilities toward the capacity to generate attraction, credibility, cultural recognition, and durable international affinity. Against this background, cultural soft power has become increasingly important to national brand positioning, particularly for middle and emerging powers seeking to strengthen international influence without relying primarily on coercive resources. This study examines how Vietnam can position its national brand through cultural soft power amid intensifying geopolitical competition, digital transformation, and the growing strategic importance of cultural and creative industries. The study adopts a qualitative research design combining theoretical synthesis, policy-document analysis, comparative interpretation, and descriptive analysis of internationally recognized soft-power and heritage indicators. The analytical framework integrates soft power theory, nation branding and competitive identity, public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, cultural industries, and international perception. The findings show that Vietnam possesses a substantial cultural resource base, including historical depth, diverse tangible and intangible heritage, distinctive cuisine, regional cultural diversity, cultural-tourism assets, traditional crafts, and growing creative capacity. In the Global Soft Power Index 2026, Vietnam ranks 52nd among 193 countries and 9th in Asia; it ranks 14th for “food the world loves,” while perceptions of a “rich heritage” improved to 49th. However, the study identifies a cultural soft-power conversion gap between the possession of attractive cultural resources and their transformation into internationally scalable national-brand value. Cultural assets remain fragmented across sectors, international storytelling is not yet sufficiently coordinated, globally competitive cultural brands remain limited, and stronger integration is required among cultural diplomacy, cultural industries, tourism, digital communication, community participation, and national branding. The study proposes an integrated Cultural Soft Power–National Brand Positioning Framework based on five strategic pillars: distinctive cultural identity, globally competitive cultural products, networked cultural diplomacy, digital narrative infrastructure, and international perception measurement. It argues that Vietnam should move from promoting individual cultural assets toward managing a coherent national cultural proposition capable of generating recognition, attraction, trust, economic value, and long-term geopolitical relevance.

nation branding, cultural soft power, cultural diplomacy, cultural industries, geopolitical reconfiguration, Vietnam.

1. Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627727.
2. Brand Finance. (2025). Global Soft Power Index 2025: Vietnam rising – A cultural, economic, and innovation influence on the global stage. Brand Finance.
3. Brand Finance. (2026). Global Soft Power Index 2026: Vietnam sustains global soft power ranking as influence grows. Brand Finance.
4. Cull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952.
5. Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice. Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Fan, Y. (2010). Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.16.
7. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142.
8. Nye, J. S., Jr. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580.
9. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
10. Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2026). Resolution No. 80-NQ/TW dated 7 January 2026 on the development of Vietnamese culture.
11. Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2021). Decision No. 1909/QD-TTg dated 12 November 2021 approving the Strategy for Cultural Development to 2030.
12. Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2025). Decision No. 2486/QD-TTg dated 14 November 2025 approving the Strategy for the Development of Vietnam’s Cultural Industries to 2030, with a vision to 2045.
13. Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2026). Decision No. 1306/QD-TTg dated 17 July 2026 approving the Strategy for External Cultural Relations to 2030, with a vision to 2045.
14. UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
15. UNESCO. (2026a). Viet Nam: World Heritage Convention – State Party profile. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
16. UNESCO. (2026b). Viet Nam: Intangible Cultural Heritage – State profile. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
17. Pham, C. H., Pham, N. D., Duong, D. T., Hoang, A. C., & Tran, D. L. (2025). Leveraging the value of brocade weaving for the development of distinctive tourism in Northern Vietnam’s mountainous areas. Journal of Science and Technology – Nguyen Tat Thanh University, 8(S1), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.55401/sdxxf292.
18. Vu, V. T., & Nguyen, T. P. (2026). Heritage memory and identity in Vietnam with a focus on residents’ topophilia for sustainable cultural tourism development. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v8i1.1758.
19. Phuong, N. T., & Lam, N. T. N. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of cultural heritage communication based on local community feedback: A case study of Hanoi City. Scientific Culture, 11(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379320.
20. Nguyen, T. P. (2025). The impact of sustainable tourism on local community cultural heritage conservation awareness in Hanoi. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 675. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v7i2.1233.
21. Phuong, N. T. (2025). Digital preservation of Vietnamese cultural heritage: Opportunities and limitations in the age of smart technology. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2025-0035.
22. Ha, D. H., Vu, V. T., & Pham, T. H. (2026). The impact of architectural heritage interpretation quality at the Imperial Citadel of Hue on responsible tourist behavior in sustainable tourism: The mediating role of personal norms. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v8i2.2035.
23. Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2014). Resolution No. 33-NQ/TW dated 9 June 2014 on building and developing Vietnamese culture and people to meet the requirements of sustainable national development.
24. Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2020). Conclusion No. 76-KL/TW dated 4 June 2020 on continuing the implementation of Resolution No. 33-NQ/TW on building and developing Vietnamese culture and people to meet the requirements of sustainable national development.
25. Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2021). Decision No. 2013/QD-TTg dated 30 November 2021 approving the Strategy for Cultural Diplomacy to 2030.
26. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2021). Decision No. 3586/QD-BVHTTDL dated 31 December 2021 issuing the Plan for implementing Directive No. 25/CT-TTg on advancing Vietnam's external cultural relations during 2022-2026.
27. Government of Vietnam. (2026). Resolution No. 30/NQ-CP dated 24 February 2026 issuing the Government Action Programme for implementing Resolution No. 80-NQ/TW dated 7 January 2026 on the development of Vietnamese culture.