The Causal Triadic Nexus between Debt, Economic Growth, and Export: A Time Series Analysis of the United States of America (1970 - 2021)

Author's Information:

Mohammad Rashed Yadgari

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Islamic International Indonesia (UIII)

Vol 01 No 06 (2024):Volume 01 Issue 06 November 2024

Page No.: 95-107

Abstract:

This paper examines the relationship between GDP, Exports, and Debt of America from 1970 to 2021. It is worth investigating whether the marginal decline or increase in GDP and exports impacts the debt. The methodology consists of ARDL bounds cointegration of short-run relationship and found a negative relationship between debt and exports and a positive relationship between GDP and Debt, while Toda-Yamamoto Causality found unidirectional causality that runs from exports to Debt, exports to GDP, and debt to GDP.  This study provides practical contributions to assist decision-makers in formulating fiscal policies to bring the debt to a sustainable level.

KeyWords:

GDP implosion, debt-to-GDP ratio, Toda Yamamoto causality, Autoregressive distributed Lag cointegration test.

References:

  1. Afzal, M. (2012), “Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis: Evidence from Pakistan”, Journal of Business Management and Economics, Vol.3 No.6, pp. 258-265
  2. Butt, M. S, Ahmed, Sabihuddin, & Alam, S. (2000). Economic growth, export, and external debt causality: The case of Asian countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 39(4), 591-608. 
  3. Bivens, J. (2010). Government debt and economic growth. Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper No. 271. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/bp271/
  4. Barro, R.J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economics, Vol.98 Nos 5/2, pp.103-125
  5. Dritsaki, C. (2013). Causal nexus between economic growth, exports, and government debt: The case of Greece. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), 148-158. Retrieved from https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/23048
  6. Driessen, G.A and Gravelle, J.G. (2019), “Deficit Financing, the debt, and “modern money theory”, Congressional Research Service, pp. 1-23.
  7. Engle, R. and C. Granger. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276
  8. Easterly, W. (2010). Growth Implosions and debt explosion: Do growth slowdowns case public debt crises? (Working Paper No.596). Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/1425314.
  9. Gujarati, D. N. (2021). Essentials of Econometrics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  11. Hidayat, Mohammad. (2020). Analysis of economic growth, exports, and savings to debt in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 5th Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA-2020) (pp. 239-249). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201126.027
  12. IMF Working Papers Volume 2022 Issue 076: Public Debt and Real GDP Revisiting the Impact. (2022). International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view /journals/001/2022/076/001.2022.issue-076
  13. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254
  14. Karagöl, E. (2002). The causality analysis of external debt service and GNP: The case of Turkey. Central Bank Review, 2(1), 39-64.
  15. Kumar, M.S., & Woo, J. (2014). Debt and Growth: Is There a Magic Threshold? International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs.
  16. Kourtellos, A., Stengos, T. and Tan, C.M. (2013), “ The effect of public debt on growth in multiple regimes”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 38 No.8, pp. 35-43
  17. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54(3), 461-471
  18. Perasso, G. (1992). Debt reduction versus ‘appropriate’ domestic policies. Kyklos, 45(4), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1992.tb02132
  19. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  20. Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79-113.
  21. Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters58(1), 17-29
  22. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
  23. Ricardo, D. (1951), “On the principles of political economy and taxation”.in Sraffa, P. (Ed.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol.1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, with the collaboration of M. Dobb.
  24. Syukri, A. U. (2020). Causality between gross domestic product, exports, imports, foreign exchange reserves, and foreign debt in Indonesia. JDE (Journal of Developing Economies), 5(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.20473/jde.v5i2.18275
  25. Saad, W. (2012). Causality between economic growth, export, and external debt servicing: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(11), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n11p134
  26. Timmer, Y., de Soyres, C., Kawai, R., & Wang, M. (2021). Public debt and real GDP: Revisiting the impact. IMFWorkingPaper No. 2022/076. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513589176.001
  27. Wray, R.L. (2015), Modern Monetary Theory: A primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems, 2nd ed., Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.