Productivity Narratives and Environmental Blind Spots: A Systematic Review of How Organizations Weigh Environmental Criteria When Adopting Generative AI

Author's Information:

Noé Chávez-Hernández

Tecnológico Nacional de México: TES de Coacalco, México

Beatriz Sauza-Ávila

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo: Escuela Superior de Ciudad Sahagún, México

Vol 03 No 10 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 10 October 2026

Page No.: 1252-1264

Abstract:

Generative AI (GenAI) spreads through organizations faster than any shared method for weighing its environmental cost. Two literatures study the phenomenon from opposite ends. Adoption research explains why firms take up GenAI; environmental research measures the energy, water, and carbon it consumes. Whether the first treats the findings of the second as decision criteria remains unexamined. This systematic review asks how organizations incorporate environmental criteria into GenAI adoption and tests the proposition that productivity and modernization narratives dominate adoption and limit environmental governance. A TITLE-ABS-KEY search combining GenAI, adoption, and environmental terms yielded a corpus of 59 sources; main findings were extracted for 46 and grouped by the role each study assigns to the environment. Fourteen studies explain adoption through readiness, institutional pressure, top management support, and ethical leadership. None records ecological cost as a determinant, while six model ethics explicitly. Eleven studies treat environmental performance as an outcome of adoption. Twenty-one measures the environmental burden or proposes instruments to govern it, yet only six tie those instruments to organizational decisions. The evidence supports the proposition with one qualification: environmental criteria are absent from adoption models, which is different from absent from practice. The review separates two meanings of "environmental" that the literature conflates, consolidates candidate decision criteria, and sets an agenda for testing ecological cost as an antecedent of adoption. 

KeyWords:

Generative AI, technology adoption, environmental criteria, Green AI, carbon footprint, life cycle assessment.

References:

  1. Agrawal, K. (2023). Towards Adoption of Generative AI in Organizational Settings. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 64, 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2240744 
  2. Ajili, B.Y., Bouebdallah, N., & Long, H. (2025). Factors influencing generative artificial intelligence adoption in Vietnaam’s banking sector: an empirical study. Financial Innovation, 11(119), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-02500788-7 
  3. Alcalá, S. G. S., De Nicolás, V. L., López-López, Á. J., & Ventosa, M. (2025). A Multi‐Criteria and Empirical Study for Determining the Influencing Factors of Generative Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Companies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 43(2), 750-772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3215 
  4. Alonso-Robisco, A., Esparcia, C., & Jareño, F. (2026). On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI. ArXiv, abs/2603.26712. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.26712 
  5. Alves, M., Martinho, D., Marcao, R., & Sobreiro, P. (2026). Generative AI Adoption in B2B Firms: Ethical Governance, Innovation  Capabilities, and  Long-Term Competitive Performance. Systems, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040410 
  6. Antoniuk, D., & Koliada, O. (2025). Ensuring sustainable use of generative artificial intelligence by enterprises based on resource consumption optimization. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.330586 
  7. Bag, S., Srivastava, G., Routray, S., & Chiarini, A. (2026). Generative AI, ESG Sensemaking, and Environmental Performance: an OIPT Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(5), 7196-7217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70520 
  8. Berthelot, A., Caron, E., Jay, M., & Lefèvre, L. (2025). Understanding the Environmental Impact of Generative AI Services. Communications of the ACM, 68(7), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3725984 
  9. Bolón-Canedo, V., Morán-Fernández, L., Cancela, B., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2024). A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing, 599, 128096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128096 
  10. Bozkurt, A. (2025). AI’s Thirst, AI’s Heat, AI’s Waste: Exposing the Hidden Environmental Impact of Every Artificial Intelligence Interaction. Open Praxis, 17(4), 638-647. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.4.1058 
  11. Desroches, C., Chauvin, M., Ladan, L., Vateau, C., Gosset, S., & Cordier, P. (2025). Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: A projective study of corporations' AI environmental impacts. ArXiv, abs/2501.14334. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.14334 
  12. d'Orgeval, A., Sheehan, S., Avenas, Q., Assoumou, E., & Sessa, V. (2026). Generative AI impact assessment through a life cycle              analysis  of               multiple               data        center    typologies.           Applied               Energy,  406,1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127288 
  13. Elbouknify, I., Machado, M., & Iannario, M. (2026). Designing green artificial intelligence (Green AI) models for finance: a novel approach for sustainable and responsible adoption. Financial Innovation, 12(96), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-026-00915-y 
  14. Ellahi, R. M., Wang, K., Qureshi, J., & Wood, L. C. (2025). Harnessing Generative AI Decision Support for Environmental and Social Supply Chain Sustainability. Sustainable Development, 34(3), 3641-3653. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70511 
  15. Esho, E. O., Akinyelu, A. A., & Dinis, M. A. (2026). Sustainable generative AI and quantum computing: review assessment on the environmental impact of generative AI and quantum technologies. Frontiers in Sustainability, 7, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1726832 
  16. Friday, B. B., & Ali, D. A. (2024). Balancing Innovation and Sustainability: Assessing the Impact of Generative AI on Energy Consumption. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 13(9), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2024/v13/i9/sep24021 
  17. Goff, T. L. (2024). Recommendations for public action towards sustainable generative AI systems. ArXiv, abs/2402.01646. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.01646 
  18. Helms, F., Hönemann, K., & Wiesche, M. (2025). Building Green Generative AI: An Ecosystem-Wide Approach to Environmental Sustainability. In A. Pucihar, M. Kljajić Borštnar, S. Blatnik, M. Marolt, R. W. H. Bons, K. Smit, & M. Glowatz (Eds.), & (Ed.), 38th Bled eConference: Empowering Transformation: Shaping Digital Futures for All: Conference Proceedings (pp. 617-632). University of Maribor Press. https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.38
  19. Idnay, B., Xu, Z., Adams, W. G., Adibuzzaman, M., Anderson, N. R., Bahroos, N., Bell, D. S., Bumgardner, C., Campion, T. R., Castro, M., Cimino, J. J., Cohen, I., Dorr, D. A., Elkin, P., Fan, J., Ferris, T., Foran, D. J., Hanauer, D. A., Hogarth, M., … Peng, Y. (2024). Environment scan of generative AI infrastructure for clinical and translational science. Npj Health Systems, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-024-00009-w 
  20. Jamwal, A., Kumar, A., Samadhiya, A., & Luthra, S. (2026). Gen‐AI Is Not an Option for Environment SustainabilityEnabling of Gen‐AI for Responsible and Green Supply Chains Using a Grey Network Map (GNM). Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71068 
  21. Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. M. (2025). How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inference. ArXiv, abs/2505.09598. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.09598 
  22. Joshi, Y., Almugren, I., Sharma, V. K., & Imre, G. (2026). Does generative AI affect firm sustainability and market performance? Implications for information systems practitioners. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-10-2025-1079 
  23. Khan, S., Mehmood, S., & Khan, S. U. (2024). Navigating innovation in the age of AI: how generative AI and innovation influence organizational performance in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 36(3), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-06-2024-0302 
  24. Kim, M.K., Yoo, T.A., & Chung, J.B. (2026). Toward Sustainable AI: A Scoping Review of Carbon Footprint and Environmental Impacts Across Training and Inference Stages. IEEE Access, 14, 18881–18896. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3659894 
  25. Konat, G., Salihoglu, E., & Han, A. (2026). Financial investments in AI-based technologies and carbon footprint in selected advanced industrial economies. Carbon Balance and Management, 21 (31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00383-4 
  26. Kumar, A., Shankar, A., Hollebeek, L., Behl, A., & Lim, W. M. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolution: A deep dive into GenAI adoption. Journal of Business Research, 189, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115160 
  27. Laachach, A., & Sadiku‐Dushi, N. (2026). Generative AI and Environmental Sustainability: Behavioral Mediation and Carbon Footprint Challenges. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(6), 8895-8908. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70651 
  28. Liccardo, G., Cerchione, R., & Passaro, R. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review on GenAI Through the Lens of Corporate Sustainability. European Conference on Knowledge Management, 26(1), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.26.1.3777 
  29. Ligozat, A.-L., Lefèvre, J., Bugeau, A., & Combaz, J. (2022). Unraveling the hidden environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment life cycle assessment of AI solutions. Sustainability, 14(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095172 
  30. Liu, D., Kamal, M. M., Dou, J., & Zhang, J. (2026). Generative AI, digital dexterity, and organizational future performance: The roles of decision-making and institutional governance for sustainable supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 227, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124656 
  31. Liu, Y., Ho, T. C. F., Omar, R., & Ning, B. (2025). Green entrepreneurial leadership and AI-driven green process innovation: Advancing environmental sustainability in the Traditional Chinese Medicine industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 375, 124438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124438 
  32. Malhotra, G., & Manzoor, R. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence adoption for achieving supply chain efficiency, circularity, and sustainability. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 39(2), 736–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-02-2025-0072 
  33. Malik, F. (2025). Carbon-Conscious Intelligence: Life Cycle Assessment and Green Standards for Generative AI. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(8), 1030-1037. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug585 
  34. Mercuri, F., Quaglieri, L., Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M., & Quattrociocchi, B. (2025). Technological, organizational, and environmental determinants influencing the intention to adopt GEN-AI of public sector organizations: a cross-country comparative analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 29(7), 2175-2200. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-03-2025-0359 
  35. Mohamed, M. A. H., Al-Mhdawi, M., Ojiako, U., Qazi, A., Mahammedi, C., & Dacre, N. (2026). A GenAI-driven risk management framework for sustainable development projects. Project Leadership and Society, 7, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2026.100217 
  36. Oliveira, A. P., Carraquico, T., & Martínez-Pérez, C. (2026). Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Review of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint Across the AI Lifecycle. Sustainability, 18(3),1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031359 
  37. Oyewole, O. O., & Joseph, J. F. (2025). Sustainable AI and Green Computing: Reducing the Environmental Impact of Large-Scale Models with Energy-Efficient Techniques. International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, 13(3),19-26. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrnsc.v13i3.276 
  38. Rahman, S. M., Raihan, A., & Abudalfa, S. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Assessment: A New Paradigm for Sustainability Analysis. Environmental Management, 76(93). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-02602402-7 
  39. Rana, N. P., Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., & Malik, N. (2024). Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations,     and         organizational               performance.       Technovation,      135,1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103064 
  40. Rojahn, M., & Grum, M. (2026). Green artificial intelligence and its lifecycle, hardware, and measurement dimensions. Information and Software Technology, 198, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2026.108186 
  41. Ruggeri, M., Anagnoste, S., & Savastano, M. (2025). Navigating AI sustainability: A life cycle assessment approach toward viable future solutions. Management & Marketing, 20, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2025-0037 
  42. Şahin, O., & Karayel, D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Business: A Systematic Review on the Threshold of Transformation. Journal of Smart Systems Research, 5(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.58769/joinssr.1597110 
  43. Shen, T., & Badulescu, A. (2025). Generative AI and Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: Roles of Innovations and AI Regulation. Sustainability, 17(19), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198661 
  44. Sidorkin, A. M. (2025). Environmental Impact of Generative AI: Carbon and Water Footprint. AI-EDU Arxiv. https://doi.org/10.36851/ai-edu.vi.5448 
  45. Singh, A., Alghafes, R., Koltai, J., & Vishnoi, S. (2026). Harnessing Generative AI for Sustainable Supply Chains: Lean, Circular               and Green Perspectives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(5),          7063-7079. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70515 
  46. Singh, K., Chatterjee, S., & Mariani, M. M. (2024). Applications of generative AI and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamism. Technovation, 133, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103021 
  47. Smith, G. K. (2025). Strategic Integration of Generative AI: Opportunities, Challenges, and Organizational Impacts. Law, Economics and Society, 1(1) 156-168. https://doi.org/10.30560/les.v1n1p156 
  48. Tabbakh, A., Amin, L. A., Islam, M., Mahmud, G. M., Chowdhury, I. K., Saddam, M., & Mukta, H. (2024). Towards sustainable AI: a comprehensive framework for Green AI. Discover Sustainability, 5(408), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00641-4 
  49. Varouchas, E. (2026). Executives’ perspectives on the impact of generative AI in business: a qualitative study of strategic, ethical, and organizational transformations. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-10-2025-0493 
  50. Verdecchia, R., Sallou, J., & Cruz, L. (2023). A systematic review of Green AI. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1507 
  51. Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024). Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-035205 
  52. Wang, Q., Liu, T., & Li, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Sustainability: Investigating the AI‐EKC Nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13. Sustainable Development, 34(1), 1141-1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70294 
  53. Wicaksono, W., & Riharjo, I. B. (2025). Generative AI and environmental sustainability issues how should organizations address this? International Conference of Business and Social Sciences, 5(1), 793-804. https://doi.org/10.24034/icobuss.v5i1.723 
  54. Xiao, T., Nerini, F., Matthews, H.D., Tavoni, M., & You, F. (2025). Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artificial intelligence servers in the USA. Nature Sustainability, 8, 1541–1553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893025-01681-y 
  55. Xu, Z., Ramayah, T., & Yubo, S. (2025). Determinants of Generative Artificial Intelligence adoption in insurance companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 26(1), 272-291. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.9562.2025 
  56. Yuan, C., Yin, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., & Moon, H.-J. (2025). Exploring technology, organization and environmental factors driving firms generative AI adoption intention: the moderating role of trans-parasocial relation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 40(5), 1146-1159. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-04-2024-0257 
  57. Zada, M., Khan, S., Mehmood, S., & Contreras-Barraza, N. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in FinTech: Applications, environmental, social, and governance considerations, and organizational performance: The moderating role of ethical dilemmas. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1303-1347. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3323 
  58. Zhao, X., & Li, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public environmental concern: Impacts on green innovation transformation in energy-intensive enterprises. Energy Policy, 198,114469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114469 
  59. Zhou, Y., & Bu, W. (2025). From Artificial Intelligence to Energy Reduction: How Green Innovation Channels Corporate Sustainability. Systems, 13(9), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090757