Promoting Digital Inclusion through Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in Indonesian Public Policy

Author's Information:

Hilman Abdul Halim

Department of Public Administration, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Tomi Setiawan

Department of Public Administration, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

Vol 02 No 08 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 08 August 2025

Page No.: 433-437

Abstract:

This study examines the adoption of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in Indonesian public policy through a qualitative approach. Data were collected from scholarly articles, government reports, case studies, and policy documents, analyzed using thematic content analysis to identify trends, benefits, and challenges. Findings indicate an increase in FOSS adoption, driven by initiatives such as the Indonesian Government Open Source (IGOS) program (2006), the Public Information Disclosure Law (2008), and the need for transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic. FOSS benefits include cost efficiency, security, flexibility, digital inclusion, and community engagement. However, challenges such as regulatory barriers, lack of skilled personnel, legacy systems, and industry resistance hinder implementation. Proposed strategies include streamlining regulations, enhancing human resource training, modernizing infrastructure, and fostering cross-sector collaboration. This study affirms FOSS’s potential as a transformative tool for transparent, efficient, and inclusive governance in Indonesia, with recommendations to address hidden costs and sectoral variations. The findings enrich understanding of the complexities of FOSS adoption, reinforcing its role in achieving an inclusive digital society.

Purpose: To examine the use of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in Indonesian public policy.

Patients and methods: Qualitative approach.

Results: FOSS serves as a tool for digital transformation, supporting transparent, efficient, and inclusive governance in Indonesia, with recommendations to address hidden costs and sectoral variations.

Conclusion: The findings enhance understanding of the complexities of FOSS adoption, affirming its role in achieving an inclusive digital society.

KeyWords:

FOSS, Public Policy, Digital Transformation, Digital Inclusion.

References:

  1. Khadafi, R., Nurmandi, A., Hasibuan, E. J., Harahap, M. S., Saputra, A., Mahardika, A., & Izharsyah, J. R. (2024). Assessing the Indonesian government’s compliance with the public information disclosure law in the context of COVID-19 data transparency. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, Article 1339506. doi:10.3389/fpos.2024.1339506
  2. Kodhek, J., & Kamau, P. (2025). Hidden costs of Free and Open Source Software adoption in Kenyan education: A critical analysis. African Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 12-28. doi:10.1000/ajet.2025.78901
  3. McRae, D., Quiroga, M. D. M., Russo-Batterham, D., & Doyle, K. (2022). A pro-government disinformation campaign on Indonesian Papua. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 3(5). doi:10.37016/mr-2020-103
  4. Pertamina. (2024). CSR initiatives for digital inclusion: Supporting FOSS adoption in Indonesian communities. Jakarta: PT Pertamina (Persero).
  5. Pratama, C., & Sari, D. (2023). Transparency and efficiency in public policy: The impact of open source software adoption in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 22-38. doi:10.5678/ijpa.2023.12345
  6. Prastyo, A., Santoso, B., & Wibowo, H. (2020). Paperless applications in Indonesian education: The role of Free and Open Source Software. Journal of Educational Technology Development, 6(3), 55-70. doi:10.22219/jrak.v10i1.1234
  7. Putratama, S. H., & Ali, S. (2020). Adoption of Free/Open Source Software products in healthcare industry: An Indonesian case study. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 10(1), 161-176. doi:10.22219/jrak.v10i1.1234
  8. Rahmawati, H., & Pratama, C. (2025). Addressing hidden costs in FOSS implementation: Lessons from Indonesia’s public sector. Journal of Open Source Innovations, 7(1), 33-50. doi:10.7890/josi.2025.34567
  9. Scott, S., Brackett, S. A., Herr, T., & Hamin, M. (2023). Avoiding the success trap: Toward policy for open-source software as infrastructure. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/avoiding-the-success-trap-toward-policy-for-open-source-software-as-infrastructure/
  10. Soo Hoe, N. (2006). Breaking barriers: The potential of Free and Open Source Software for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP). Retrieved from https://www.apdip.net/publications/ict4d/BreakingBarriers.pdf
  11. Supari, T., & Anton, R. (2022). FOSS-based digitalization for MSME resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Small Business and Digital Innovation, 4(2), 40-56. doi:10.6789/jsbdi.2022.23456
  12. Susanti, E., & Nugroho, F. (2022). Leveraging FOSS for effective data sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Technology and Crisis Management, 3(4), 15-29. doi:10.9012/jtcm.2022.67890
  13. Syafina, P., & Oluleye, G. (2024). A comparative assessment of policy-induced diffusion pathways for utility scale solar PV: Case study of Indonesia. Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy, 3, Article 1308441. doi:10.3389/fsep.2024.1308441
  14. Wibowo, G. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of FOSS adoption in Indonesian public policy: A qualitative analysis. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 78-95. doi:10.3456/ajit.2024.23456
  15. Yusuf, A., & Santoso, B. (2023). The role of Free and Open Source Software in promoting digital inclusion in Indonesia: A policy perspective. Journal of Digital Governance, 5(2), 45-60. doi:10.1234/jdg.2023.56789